Law courts in the UK relies on a wide range of staff to ensure that legal proceedings run smoothly and efficiently.

Another high-profile case is that of the Guildford Four, similarly accused and convicted based on flawed evidence and coerced confessions. These individuals were later proven innocent, and their cases helped fuel calls for reform in the justice system.

Legal aid faces significant challenges in the UK is the limitation of resources. Over the years, the government has implemented cuts to the legal aid budget, which has led to a reduction in the scope of services available to those in need. The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Act 2012, for instance, significantly restricted the eligibility for civil legal aid. Many individuals who might have qualified for legal aid previously are now left without support, particularly in non-criminal cases such as welfare benefits, immigration, and housing disputes.

Forensic science errors have also led to wrongful convictions. In some instances, courts have relied on expert testimony that was later discredited. The case of Sally Clark, a mother wrongly convicted of killing her two children based on flawed medical evidence, is a tragic example. The expert witness’s statistical miscalculations were later condemned, but only after Clark had served years in prison and suffered tremendous personal trauma.

One of the most well-documented examples is the case of the Birmingham Six. These men were wrongly convicted in 1975 for pub bombings carried out by the IRA. It took over 16 years for their convictions to be quashed, during which time they spent years in prison for crimes they didn’t commit. Their case highlighted not only individual failings but also systemic problems in how police and courts handled terrorism-related prosecutions.

Access to justice is a key issue in Wales, particularly in rural and post-industrial areas. Court closures in recent years have raised concerns about people having to travel long distances for legal pro